The Swiss company Bystronic commences cooperation with JCommerce

JCommerce has begun close cooperation with Bystronic, a leading supplier of machine systems for industrial processing and related services.

Bystronic offers solutions such as advanced machines for industrial processing, including for the cutting of a variety of materials. They are  using a laser and water jet, and bending sheet metal (including for the shipbuilding and automotive industries). The equipment produced and utilized by the company requires specialized software.  It ensures a high level of precision of material processing (see the video material below).

The Swiss company decided to commence cooperation with JCommerce, entrusting them with the development of software. As a result JCommerce specialists are currently working on software projects to support Bystronic by developing new solutions in the field of Industry 4.0.

Ultimately the JCommerce team is to be expanded to 15 people this year and is to undertake projects connected with industrial automation, PLC drivers and robotics and algorithms for traffic control, as well as tests and projects using JAVA technology.

View the Video: Bystronic’s latest laser system


Technological Debt – Everything You Need to Know

This debt, even subconsciously, gives us a sense of comfort, as it allows us to indefinitely postpone hard decisions, effort, or even admitting a mistake. And this is life on credit, which Billy Gibbons warned of when he sang: “It’s too easy, it’s too easy to feel good,” lyrics which in this case are found in a bitter song about the consequences of postponing things until a later date.

Get to know your enemy

Technological debt means additional work that must be done in order to accomplish a task, due to past neglect within the project. This phenomenon often occurs in IT projects when negligence in terms of the work done means that there is a time-based debt which should be devoted to getting the project up to the expected state. In the earlier example of the IT Director, facing the challenge of implementation of new tools, paying off the debt will be based on the fact that integration with obsolete and poorly-documented infrastructure, which may have been used for years, is likely to be a long and painful process. In addition to the implementation process, a lot of work will have to be undertaken to adapt the entire system and repair unsolved problems which have built up over the years.

Debt is also used to refer to problems that arise in sloppily written code. Personally, I am inclined to say that the problems themselves are not Technological debt, but more interest on the debt incurred. We incur debt while doing any activity that contributes to the delivery of any code which is not quite up to expectations, not only in terms of the tasks to be undertaken, but also performance, readability, maintainability, and how it can be developed in the future. There may be many reasons for this state of affairs.

The sources of technological debt

To face up to a challenge which puts us in Technological debt, we must take a look at the causes, among which the following phenomena can most often be found:

  • lack of employee involvement in the tasks to be undertaken;
  • insufficient coverage of functionality in terms of testing;
  • lack of automatic testing;
  • outdated tools / technologies used in the project;
  • lack of experience of the team;
  • time pressure;
  • lack of documentation / low quality of documentation.

This list is not complete, of course, and some aspects may be closely linked to each other. Programmers can write low quality code for many reasons: because of a lack of motivation, knowledge or experience, or because of time pressure or lack of proper tools. The programmer is often only an indirect cause of the debt, as management is the responsibility of the project manager who makes decisions regarding time, tools, technology, and how they are allocated – without outside input. Sometimes it is difficult to identify the causes of the debt. Small errors in a project or strategic decisions – such as the need to provide a solution in a very short time – can lead to the creation of such debt. The origins of the phenomenon in each project can vary and are very complicated, but it does not change the fact that, regardless of its origin, Technological debt must be managed effectively.

Debt’s not always that bad

It would be a mistake to unambiguously define Technological debt as something that should always be avoided at all costs. Just as a loan may allow the company to spread its wings, Technological debt incurred reasonably can be helpful in many cases.

Technological debt may be divided into three types, which clearly show that not all debts are created equal:

  • Naive debt – resulting from negligence, bad practices, and immaturity in business.
  • Unavoidable debt – debt which we are not able to predict. Good decisions taken today may be a cause of debt in the future.
  • Strategic technological debt – debt is incurred consciously, when the benefits incurred are greater than the consequences.

It may turn out that the incurrence of debt brings with it very tangible benefits, especially in such situations as when the project hangs in the balance, and providing a sufficient batch of a program becomes “to be or not to be” for the project. The decision to incur such debt could even save the whole project (and sometimes the entire company). One should, however, take extreme care when making this type of decision, because poor management of the resulting debt can lead to disaster.

Am I in debt?

If we are aware of our debts, we are able to pay them off regularly – the debt itself is not a problem if it doesn’t harm ongoing operations. Ignorance in this case is absolutely not bliss, because we do not expect the impact, nor do we know when it will occur. Fortunately, in IT projects, symptoms that indicate the existence of the Technological debt appear quite quickly and are visible to the naked eye.

Here are a few diagnostic questions:

  • Does the programming solution work slower and slower?
  • Is there partial or total downtime in the operation of the system?
  • Are the same errors repeating themselves?
  • Is the time taken to implement new solutions constantly increasing?
  • Does the application work slowly?
  • Are your programmers reluctant to work on the project?
  • Did you push your team to implement new functionalities quicker than planned?
  • Are there instances of errors which are difficult to recreate or solve?

Even if the answer to all questions is no, you should not feel overly safe. Some experts are of the opinion that Technological debt is a permanent element of the possession or development of software and IT infrastructure.

So let’s assume that Technological debt occurs in every IT project in some form. This means that the effective management of the debt is very important. In other words, it is not enough to merely control and neutralize the effects – much more important is a methodical approach to the quality of the application, and preventing the occurrence of debt where we don’t want to incur it.

How to manage debt?

You need to manage debt and fight it on all fronts.  The following are of crucial importance:

  • Building awareness of the importance of quality within the company. Quality itself must be seen as a value which we should care about. Without this, it’s difficult to manage debt, because we can’t do much without the proper approach from employees. Their involvement is key.
  • Controlling processes. Constant feedback about what’s going on in the project helps us to react quickly when issues arise.
  • Quality assurance. Caring about the quality of software, getting it checked by specialists, not just in terms of testing, but including all aspects of quality.
  • Tests. The quicker testing begins, the sooner problems can be found. Tests at the level of documentation and unit testing eliminate debt very quickly.
  • The application of best practices, such as:
    1. adherence to rules for naming functions, procedures, etc.;
    2. the application of coding style, involving the introduction of appropriate indentation;
    3. the creation of technical documentation;
    4. the prevention of basic mistakes, e.g. table overflow, problems with the initialization of variables etc.;
    5. management of versions/backups;
    6. refactoring – the improvement of the code in order to obtain better readability and easier maintenance, future development;
    7. algorithmics: simplifying functions;
    8. pair programming – to create better quality code;
    9. code review: reflecting on those solutions used, and the removal of visible errors.
  • Training employees.
  • Promotion of unit testing. As a basic tool, including TDD as a standard tool of creating software for programmers.

Just as before, unfortunately, this list is incomplete, as debt can have very different sources, often specific to a particular company, or even a project. A company should therefore develop its own technique of debt management – most importantly, it should not ignore debt until it’s too late – until disaster strikes and the bailiffs knock on the door.

JCommerce among the winners of Forbes Diamonds

The Forbes ranking presents companies that noted growth in terms of revenue and assets in the latest three years.

JCommerce increased value by 51% and was listed in this year’s Forbes ranking of the fastest growing companies in Poland. In the category of firms with revenue between 5 million and 50 million PLN, JCommerce is in the 250th place on the Polish list, from the overall number of 2200, and 19th place in Silesia region (where the headquarter of the company is based), from the 159 companies in the region considered in ranking.

 Forbes Diamonds - JCommerce


Clutch Features JCommerce amongst Leading Polish Web Developers

Clutch, a B2B research and reviews platform, has recently included JCommerce in its ongoing coverage of top web development firms in Poland.

What’s more in the latest Clutch report on top software development and web development companies, JCommerce was recognized among the best. The mission at Clutch is to aid buyers of services in making the most informed decision when selecting a service provider. Amongst so many web development firms across the globe, we are proud to be included in their coverage and have the full intent to procure a spot at the top.

To be included in Clutch’s ranking, analysts evaluated JCommerce through a long-standing methodology that maps companies’ industry expertise against their proven ability to deliver results for their clients. A large component of this methodology are the firsthand interviews Clutch conducts with the clients. All of which have given JCommerce positive remarks:





To see the full reviews of our clients, check out the JCommerce profile on Clutch. We plan to continue to develop our position on Clutch through providing more and more references of satisfied clients.

At JCommerce, our foundation relies on quality Polish developers, who have already confirmed our reputation in many rankings. As a result, we are working towards earning our spot as one of the best development firms in the world.